The claimWhat Bear actually said
Grylls, who once wrote a vegan cookbook, has said he now considers that period a mistake and has moved to a diet built on red meat, organ meats, eggs, dairy, butter and fruit. He has described vegetables as offering him little compared with the nutrient density he gets from meat, and says he avoids them entirely. The account is based on how he reports feeling rather than on any published testing.
- foxnews.com: Bear Grylls in their own words
- Wang X et al., BMJ, 2014: dose-response meta-analysis of prospective cohorts finds all-cause mortality declines with higher fruit and vegetable intake up to about five servings a day.
- Aune D et al., International Journal of Epidemiology, 2017: dose-response meta-analysis links higher fruit and vegetable intake to lower cardiovascular disease, cancer and all-cause mortality.
- Reynolds A et al., The Lancet, 2019: series of systematic reviews and meta-analyses finds the highest dietary fibre intakes associated with the lowest rates of cardiometabolic disease.
Why it mattersWhy this matters for longevity
Elimination advice from a trusted survival figure travels much further than the personal experiment behind it
Fibre intake is already below recommended levels for most adults, and removing an entire food group makes that worse rather than better
The evidenceWhat the science says
A dose-response meta-analysis of prospective cohorts published in the BMJ found all-cause mortality falling with each additional daily serving of fruit and vegetables up to around five servings, and a later analysis in the International Journal of Epidemiology found reductions in cardiovascular disease, cancer and total mortality across a similar range. A Lancet series of systematic reviews and meta-analyses on carbohydrate quality found the lowest risk of coronary heart disease, stroke, type 2 diabetes and colorectal cancer among people with the highest dietary fibre intakes.
What the evidence does not support is the specific claim being made here. No trial or cohort shows an advantage to removing vegetables. Cohort data cannot prove causation, and people who eat more vegetables differ in other ways, but the effect is consistent across populations and dose-responsive. Reported improvements in skin, strength or gut comfort after a diet change are uncontrolled, unblinded and confounded by everything else that changed at the same time, including losing weight and dropping ultra-processed food.
TakeawayThe honest takeaway
The practical lesson
If vegetables genuinely upset your gut, that is worth investigating with a clinician rather than treating as a reason to eliminate them for life.
RelatedRelated habits
Each of these is a habit you can build on its own. Explore them through the Topics index.
SupplementsThe supplement angle: Dietary fibre
Support a habit, do not replace one
Fibre supplements can partly close a shortfall but do not carry the full package of a varied plant intake. Anyone increasing fibre should do so gradually and with more fluid.
Supplements can support good habits. They do not replace sleep, movement, nutrition, or medical care. Talk with your healthcare provider before starting anything new.
This is educational commentary, not medical advice, and does not imply that Bear Grylls endorses, is affiliated with, or uses Winning Longevity or any product. We critique the claim and the evidence, not the person. Any direct quote is a placeholder until sourced. Talk with a qualified healthcare provider before changing your routine. See our health disclaimer.
